Trust and transparency
This policy explains who publishes FairSplit content, how we check claims, which sources we prefer, how commercial interests are disclosed, and how readers can request a correction.
Published and reviewed by FairSplit Editorial Team · Last reviewed
FairSplit educational, feature, research, and comparison pages are published by the FairSplit Editorial Team. The team combines product documentation, public primary sources, structured content checks, and implementation review. We use an organization byline because no named individual author or credentialed legal reviewer has been supplied for these pages. If named contributors or qualified reviewers participate later, their role, relevant credentials, and review scope will be disclosed on the specific page.
FairSplit is the product described throughout this website. That relationship is a material conflict on product and comparison pages, so readers should verify competitor pricing and capabilities on each provider’s official website. FairSplit does not accept payment for rankings in its current comparison content.
Every guide should help a reader make a better recordkeeping or product decision even if that reader never creates a FairSplit account. We identify FairSplit as the publisher and avoid presenting product opinion as independent research.
We prefer government agencies, courts, regulators, original provider documentation, and official pricing pages. Secondary commentary may help explain context, but it does not replace an available primary source for a factual claim.
Sourced facts, product behavior, examples, and editorial recommendations are labeled by context. Hypothetical calculations are described as examples, not customer results or population averages.
FairSplit does not claim legal, financial, clinical, or judicial credentials it does not have. Product education is reviewed by the FairSplit Editorial Team. It is not a substitute for advice from a qualified professional in the reader’s jurisdiction.
Review depth depends on the subject, but the standard workflow below applies to substantive guides, research pages, comparisons, and product explanations.
Legal processes, government guidance, software features, and prices can change. We place source links near material claims on high-intent pages and display a review date so readers can judge freshness. Official government sources take priority for public-process information; official provider pages take priority for current product and price claims. A source link supports only the nearby claim and does not imply that the source endorses FairSplit.
We update pages after material FairSplit changes, identified competitor changes, or evidence-backed correction requests. A review date means the page was checked under this policy on that date; it does not guarantee that every external page remained unchanged afterward.
Automated tools may assist with drafts, readability, consistency checks, crawling, and structured-data validation. They are not treated as factual sources. The publishing team remains responsible for checking claims against cited material, removing unsupported assertions, protecting private information, and deciding whether the content should be published or corrected.
FairSplit is a record-keeping and reimbursement coordination tool. It does not provide legal advice, determine whether an expense is legally owed, guarantee payment, or guarantee that a report will be accepted as evidence. Parenting orders and state rules vary. Readers should contact their state or tribal child support agency, a court self-help resource, or qualified local counsel when they need interpretation, enforcement, filing, or safety guidance.
To report an error, email hello@fairsplit.live. Include the page URL, the disputed statement, and a primary source when available. We review evidence-backed requests, update confirmed errors, and revise the page’s review date when a material correction changes its meaning. Product support and privacy requests may use the same address or the contact page.